Representation-Guided Discrete Molecular Graph Retrosynthesis

Stochastic process-based molecular graph generators have become the state of the art for template-free single-step retrosynthesis. However, these models are typically trained only on product-reactant pairs, thereby acquiring chemistry-relevant representations in an indirect and implicit manner. Meanwhile, recent advances in computer vision demonstrate that offering representation guidance to a generator can effectively distill semantics from pretrained encoders into DiTs, substantially improving both convergence and generation quality. Whether similar gains extend to the retrosynthesis task, and what graph-specific design choices can make them work, remains an open question. To address these questions, we conduct a systematic empirical study over a unified design space spanning teacher molecular representations, endpoint and granularity choices, injection depths in the denoiser, correspondence strategies and guidance scheme. Guided by these considerations, we develop Graph-oriented Representation Guidance (GRG), which achieves 58.6 / 77.2 / 83.4 / 87.1 top-1 / 3 / 5 / 10 accuracy on USPTO-50k, while increasing diversity to 15.5, both substantially outperforming the adopted base generator. Notably, GRG consistently improves all top-k metrics in out-of-distribution settings, suggesting that representation guidance facilitates the acquisition of intrinsic chemical semantics. Meanwhile, the introduced representation guidance reduces the number of epochs by 35% and the wall-clock time by 30% to reach comparable performance. In addition, we introduce a simple yet effective representation-similarity-based reranking mechanism, which further improves the top of the ranked list without training an additional verifier.

Hidden Human-Like Nature of Machine-Generated Texts: Theory and Detection Enhancement

Machine-generated texts (MGTs) produced by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly prevalent across various applications, while their potential misuse in fake news propagation and phishing has raised serious concerns, highlighting the need for MGT detection. Existing paragraph-level detection methods commonly treat MGTs as entirely machine-like, overlooking the hidden human-like nature of machine-generated texts: even fully machine-generated texts may contain spans that are highly consistent with human writing. To this end, we first reveal the existence of such hidden human-like spans, and then theoretically analyze their impact on detection. Our analysis shows that these spans increase the sentence complexity for detection, thereby making MGT detection intrinsically harder. Based on this finding, we propose a model-agnostic stacked enhancement framework that improves existing detectors by reducing the influence of hidden human-like spans. Specifically, we model span-level retention decisions as a latent-variable problem and instantiate the optimization with a hard-EM-inspired procedure, where the detector iteratively filters confidently human-like subsequences and refines itself on the remaining text. Extensive experiments across various LLMs and practical scenarios demonstrate that the proposed framework consistently enhances existing detectors. Notably, the framework can also work in a training-free manner, offering flexibility and scalability for practical deployment.

Similar Users-Augmented Interest Network

Click-through rate (CTR) prediction is one of the core tasks in recommender systems. User behavior sequences, as one of the most effective features, can accurately reflect user preferences and significantly improve prediction accuracy. Richer behavior sequences often enable more comprehensive user profiling, and recent studies have shown that scaling the length of user behavior sequence can yield substantial gains in CTR. However, due to the widespread sparsity in recommender systems, incomplete behavior sequences are common in real-world scenarios. Existing sequential modeling methods often rely solely on the target user's own behavior, and therefore struggle in such scenarios. This paper proposes a novel method called SUIN (Similar Users-augmented Interest Network), which enhances the target user's behavior sequence with behaviors from similar users to enhance the user profile for CTR prediction. Specifically, we use behavior embeddings encoded by a sequence encoder to retrieve users with similar behaviors from a user retrieval pool. The behavior sequences of these similar users are then concatenated with that of the target user in descending order of similarity to construct an augmented sequence. Given that the augmented sequence contains behaviors from multiple users, we propose a user-specific target-aware position encoding, which identifies the source user of each behavior and captures its relative position to the target item. Furthermore, to mitigate the empirically observed noise in similar users' behaviors, we design a user-aware target attention that jointly considers item-item and user-user correlations, fully exploiting the potential of the augmented behavior sequence. Comprehensive experiments on widely-used short-term and long-term sequence benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art sequential CTR models.

IE as Cache: Information Extraction Enhanced Agentic Reasoning

Information Extraction aims to distill structured, decision-relevant information from unstructured text, serving as a foundation for downstream understanding and reasoning. However, it is traditionally treated merely as a terminal objective: once extracted, the resulting structure is often consumed in isolation rather than maintained and reused during multi-step inference. Moving beyond this, we propose \textit{IE-as-Cache}, a framework that repurposes IE as a cognitive cache to enhance agentic reasoning. Drawing inspiration from hierarchical computer memory, our approach combines query-driven extraction with cache-aware reasoning to dynamically maintain compact intermediate information and filter noise. Experiments on challenging benchmarks across diverse LLMs demonstrate significant improvements in reasoning accuracy, indicating that IE can be effectively repurposed as a reusable cognitive resource and offering a promising direction for future research on downstream uses of IE.

CMedTEB & CARE: Benchmarking and Enabling Efficient Chinese Medical Retrieval via Asymmetric Encoders

Effective medical text retrieval requires both high accuracy and low latency. While LLM-based embedding models possess powerful retrieval capabilities, their prohibitive latency and high computational cost limit their application in real-time scenarios. Furthermore, the lack of comprehensive and high-fidelity benchmarks hinders progress in Chinese medical text retrieval. In this work, we introduce the Chinese Medical Text Embedding Benchmark (CMedTEB), a benchmark spanning three kinds of practical embedding tasks: retrieval, reranking, and semantic textual similarity (STS). Distinct from purely automated datasets, CMedTEB is curated via a rigorous multi-LLM voting pipeline validated by clinical experts, ensuring gold-standard label quality while effectively mitigating annotation noise. On this foundation, we propose the Chinese Medical Asymmetric REtriever (CARE), an asymmetric architecture that pairs a lightweight BERT-style encoder for online query encoding with a powerful LLM-based encoder for offline document encoding. However, optimizing such an asymmetric retriever with two structurally different encoders presents distinctive challenges. To address this, we introduce a novel two-stage training strategy that progressively bridges the query and document representations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CARE surpasses state-of-the-art symmetric models on CMedTEB, achieving superior retrieval performance without increasing inference latency.

Learning from Emptiness: De-biasing Listwise Rerankers with Content-Agnostic Probability Calibration

Generative listwise reranking leverages global context for superior retrieval but is plagued by intrinsic position bias, where models exhibit structural sensitivity to input order independent of relevance. Existing mitigations present a dilemma: inference-time aggregation incurs prohibitive latency, while training-based methods often fail to eradicate ingrained priors, particularly in compact models. To resolve this dilemma, we propose CapCal (Content-Agnostic Probability Calibration), a training-free framework that mechanically decouples positional bias from ranking decisions. By estimating the bias distribution via content-free placeholders, CapCal rectifies output logits through an entropy-adaptive contrastive mechanism. Evaluations across 10 benchmarks confirm that CapCal achieves superior performance among training-free methods while preserving single-pass efficiency. Notably, it unlocks the latent potential of lightweight models (e.g., 0.6B), delivering absolute NDCG gains exceeding 10 points and outperforming both permutation-based aggregation and data-augmentation baselines.

SPARD: Self-Paced Curriculum for RL Alignment via Integrating Reward Dynamics and Data Utility

The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) is shifting the focus from single, verifiable tasks toward complex, open-ended real-world scenarios, imposing significant challenges on the post-training phase. In these settings, the scale and complexity of reward systems have grown significantly, transitioning toward multi-objective formulations that encompass a comprehensive spectrum of model capabilities and application contexts. However, traditional methods typically rely on fixed reward weights, ignoring non-stationary learning dynamics and struggling with data heterogeneity across dimensions. To address these issues, we propose SPARD, a framework that establishes an automated, self-paced curriculum by perceiving learning progress to dynamically adjust multi-objective reward weights and data importance, thereby synchronizing learning intent with data utility for optimal performance. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that SPARD significantly enhances model capabilities across all domains.

On the Role of Reasoning Patterns in the Generalization Discrepancy of Long Chain-of-Thought Supervised Fine-Tuning

Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) trajectories has become a pivotal phase in building large reasoning models. However, how CoT trajectories from different sources influence the generalization performance of models remains an open question. In this paper, we conduct a comparative study using two sources of verified CoT trajectories generated by two competing models, \texttt{DeepSeek-R1-0528} and \texttt{gpt-oss-120b}, with their problem sets controlled to be identical. Despite their comparable performance, we uncover a striking paradox: lower training loss does not translate to better generalization. SFT on \texttt{DeepSeek-R1-0528} data achieves remarkably lower training loss, yet exhibits significantly worse generalization performance on reasoning benchmarks compared to those trained on \texttt{gpt-oss-120b}. To understand this paradox, we perform a multi-faceted analysis probing token-level SFT loss and step-level reasoning behaviors. Our analysis reveals a difference in reasoning patterns. \texttt{gpt-oss-120b} exhibits highly convergent and deductive trajectories, whereas \texttt{DeepSeek-R1-0528} favors a divergent and branch-heavy exploration pattern. Consequently, models trained with \texttt{DeepSeek-R1} data inherit inefficient exploration behaviors, often getting trapped in redundant exploratory branches that hinder them from reaching correct solutions. Building upon this insight, we propose a simple yet effective remedy of filtering out frequently branching trajectories to improve the generalization of SFT. Experiments show that training on selected \texttt{DeepSeek-R1-0528} subsets surprisingly improves reasoning performance by up to 5.1% on AIME25, 5.5% on BeyondAIME, and on average 3.6% on five benchmarks.

SpecSteer: Synergizing Local Context and Global Reasoning for Efficient Personalized Generation

Realizing personalized intelligence faces a core dilemma: sending user history to centralized large language models raises privacy concerns, while on-device small language models lack the reasoning capacity required for high-quality generation. Our pilot study shows that purely local enhancements remain insufficient to reliably bridge this gap. We therefore propose SpecSteer, an asymmetric collaborative inference framework that synergizes private on-device context with cloud-scale reasoning. SpecSteer casts collaboration as Bayesian knowledge fusion and repurposes speculative decoding as a distributed alignment protocol, yielding a Draft--Verify--Recover pipeline: the on-device model drafts personalized sequences; the cloud validates via a ratio-based mechanism that decouples reasoning verification from private context, filtering logical flaws without accessing raw user context; upon rejection, a steering recovery injects local intent during correction. Experiments demonstrate that SpecSteer successfully closes the reasoning gap and achieves superior personalized generation performance, while delivering a 2.36x speedup over standard baselines.

Beyond Surrogates: A Quantitative Analysis for Inter-Metric Relationships

The Consistency property between surrogate losses and evaluation metrics has been extensively studied to ensure that minimizing a loss leads to metric optimality. However, the direct relationship between different evaluation metrics remains significantly underexplored. This theoretical gap results in the "Metric Mismatch" frequently observed in industrial applications, where gains in offline validation metrics fail to translate into online performance. To bridge this disconnection, this paper proposes a unified theoretical framework designed to quantify the relationships between metrics. We categorize metrics into different classes to facilitate a comparative analysis across different mathematical forms and interrogates these relationships through Bayes-Optimal Set and Regret Transfer. Through this framework, we provide a new perspective on identifying the structural asymmetry in regret transfer, enabling the design of evaluation systems that are theoretically guaranteed to align offline improvements with online objectives.